Bug#804597: blah

[Nicholas Bamber]

On 03/12/15 15:34, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 01:58:59PM +0000, Nicholas Bamber wrote:
>> uscan does not seem to take very long to run. That makes this somewhat
>> unimportant. I would like to see an example before persuing this.
>>
>> Also I tried with LWP::UserAgent::ProgressBar. It provides a different
>> interface than LWP::UserAgent which means make it optional is quote hard.
>
> Thanks for trying.   Yah, true especially for people with fast internet
> asccess )me included.)
>
> I think I fixed all other valid bugs and wishlists by now.
>
> Osamu
>


For what it's worth, I think LWP::UserAgent::ProgressAny might be a 
better interface to work with. But that's a moot point because there 
just does not seem to be a use case as far as I can see.