Bug#815980: tracker.debian.org: All packages have uscan issues

[Lucas Nussbaum]

Hi,

On 03/03/16 at 21:55 +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> Hi again,
> 
> I have a second thought.  UDD used to work around --dehs <errors>
> problem.  Now you do not need to do so.  Let's make thing simpler.
> 
> Since I never coded in ruby, you must give some break for me making
> buggy code but attached patch (after bug fixes if needed) should address
> issues on UDD web page.
> 
> This simplifies UDD code and keeps uscan away from another bloat.

Thanks for your patch!

I've integrated it. Now I have 2641 packages with errors in unstable,
which looks is more in line with what's expected.

Looking at the errors, uscan doesn't seem to use the <errors> tag, but instead
output its errors in the <warnings> tag. (but that was already the case).

The most popular errors are:

1065  /no matching files for watch line/
982  /failed: (400|404|401|403|406|410|500|502|503|521|301|302)/
514  /uscan returned an empty output/
23  /No good upstream filename found after removing/
21  /Filename pattern missing version delimiters/
12  /no matching hrefs for pattern/
5  /debian\/watch is an obsolete version 1 watch file/
4  /ailed to parse XML: /
3  /potentially unsafe or malformed uversionmangle pattern:/
3  /malformed opts=... in watch file, skipping line/
2  /potentially unsafe or malformed dversionmangle pattern:/
1  /unrecognised option fullsourcemangle/
1  /Unknown protocol in debian\/watch, skipping/
1  /In debian\/watch, potentially unsafe or malformed filenamemangle pattern/
1  /debian\/watch ended with \\; skipping last line/
1  /could not open debian\/watch: No such file or directory/
1  /Can't determine protocol and site in/

Thanks again, I'm closing this bug.

Lucas