No subject

[Dmitry Bogatov]

Fcc: +sent
Subject: Re: Bug#841270: RFS: debrequest/0.2 ITP
In-reply-to: <1476954418.4434.8.camel at 43-1.org>
References: <E1bwlAI-00078R-8b at fencepost.gnu.org> <1476954418.4434.8.camel at 43-1.org>
Comments: In-reply-to Ansgar Burchardt <ansgar at debian.org>
   message dated "Thu, 20 Oct 2016 11:06:58 +0200."
Sign: Yes
--------

[2016-10-20 11:06] Ansgar Burchardt <ansgar at debian.org>
> It might be more useful to add this to `devscripts` or some other
> existing package rather than adding a new package.

Pros:
  - `debrequest' is developer tool, and probably will be installed only with
     `devscripts', so from user perspective making it part of `devscripts' is
     right thing.
Cons:
  - `debrequest' is written in Python3. Including it into `devscripts', written
     in Perl would not facilate code reuse and will complicate maintainace.
     Depends, whether anyone in devescrips team can/want maintain python3 code.

Added devscripts-devel@ into thread. Your opinions, devscripts maintainers?

-- 
X-Web-Site: https://sinsekvu.github.io | Note that I process my email in batch,
Accept-Languages: eo,ru,en             | at most once every 24 hours. If matter
Accept: text/plain, text/x-diff        | is urgent, you have my phone number.