[Docker-maint] Bug#860608: [pkg-golang-devel] Bug#860608: golang: FTBFS: Go version is "go1.6.1", ignoring -next /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/api/next.txt

[Michael Stapelberg]

On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 12:05 PM, Michael Hudson-Doyle <
michael.hudson at canonical.com> wrote:

> On 19 April 2017 at 20:55, Lucas Nussbaum <lucas at debian.org> wrote:
>
>> On 19/04/17 at 09:05 +0200, Michael Stapelberg wrote:
>> > This is the third time an FTBFS report against this package (which was
>> > removed from Debian) was submitted.
>> >
>> > The other two times were
>> > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=855926 and
>> > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=848806, both were
>> closed
>> > asking for an explanation as to why the issue was filed in the first
>> place.
>>
>> ... And none sending the question to the bug submitter.
>
>
> Defeated by the Debian BTS, I didn't realize that you had to email the
> submitter separately when closing a bug...
>
>
>>
>> > lucas, is this a bug in your rebuild infrastructure, or did something go
>> > wrong with the removal?
>> > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=839364 (same issue
>> as the
>> > one you’re reporting) was closed by ftpmaster due to package removal.
>>
>> In my local Sources file, I have:
>
>
> [...]
>
>
>> 'Extra-Source-Only' means that there are still binary packages in the
>> archive
>> that were built using that version of the golang package.
>>
>> In fact, for that version:
>> $ grep -e Package -e Using 127.0.0.1\:9999_debian_dists_t
>> esting_main_binary-amd64_Packages |grep -B1 'golang (= 2:1.6.1-2)'
>> Package: golang-github-armon-go-metrics-dev
>> Built-Using: golang (= 2:1.6.1-2), golang-github-datadog-datadog-go (=
>> 0.0~git20150930.0.b050cd8-1), golang-github-prometheus-common (=
>> 0+git20160321.4045694-1), golang-goprotobuf (= 0.0~git20160330-1),
>> golang-procfs (= 0+git20150616.c91d8ee-1), golang-prometheus-client (=
>> 0.7.0+ds-3), golang-protobuf-extensions (= 0+git20150513.fc2b8d3-4)
>> --
>> Package: golang-github-gosexy-gettext-dev
>> Built-Using: golang (= 2:1.6.1-2)
>> --
>> Package: golang-github-hashicorp-go-msgpack-dev
>> Built-Using: golang (= 2:1.6.1-2)
>> --
>> Package: golang-github-stretchr-objx-dev
>> Built-Using: golang (= 2:1.6.1-2)
>> --
>> Package: golang-github-kr-pty-dev
>> Built-Using: golang (= 2:1.6.1-2)
>>
>> This case could be ignored by the rebuild scripts, or binnmus could be
>> trigerred to get rid of the other versions. I'm not sure it makes sense
>> to ship
>> that many copies of golang in stretch.
>>
>> I think I read something about an organized plan to get rid of such extra
>> packages using binnmus, but maybe I was dreaming. Ccing debian-release at .
>>
>
> I think I heard something about that. FWIW, though, these Built-Using
> fields are bogus, golang -dev packages just ship source and so do not
> actually contain anything built by the mentioned version of the compiler. I
> think I've managed to hammer this into everyone's heads now but I guess
> there are plenty of packages in the archive that haven't had an upload
> since then (so I guess the binNMUs could just drop the field?).
>

Updating or dropping the field seems fine with me. Could you do these 4
binNMUs so that we can close out this bug please? :)

-- 
Best regards,
Michael
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/docker-maint/attachments/20170421/0a73403f/attachment.html>