[Dwn-trans-commit] CVS german/2006/34

[CVS User kreutzm-guest]

Update of /cvsroot/dwn-trans/german/2006/34
In directory haydn:/tmp/cvs-serv30342

Modified Files:
	index.wml 
Log Message:
Sync auf 1.21 (Joey)


--- /cvsroot/dwn-trans/german/2006/34/index.wml	2006/08/20 13:59:20	1.6
+++ /cvsroot/dwn-trans/german/2006/34/index.wml	2006/08/20 19:51:59	1.7
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 #use wml::debian::weeklynews::header PUBDATE="2006-08-nic" SUMMARY=""
-#use wml::debian::translation-check translation="1.18"
+#use wml::debian::translation-check translation="1.21"
 #use wml::debian::acronyms
-# $Id: index.wml,v 1.6 2006/08/20 13:59:20 kreutzm-guest Exp $ XXX
+# $Id: index.wml,v 1.7 2006/08/20 19:51:59 kreutzm-guest Exp $ XXX
 
 <p>Willkommen zur 34. Ausgabe der DWN in diesem Jahr, dem wöchentlichen
 Newsletter der Debian-Gemeinschaft. Jörg Jaspert <a
@@ -125,6 +125,37 @@
 least one month before it migrates into <a href="$(HOME)/releases/testing/">\
 testing</a>.</p>
 
+<p><strong>New Architectures for Packages.</strong> Ludovic Brenta <a
+href="http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/07/msg00537.html">wondered</a>
+how to inform <a href="$(HOME)/devel/buildd/">build daemon</a> that a package
+should be built on another architecture than before.  Luk Claes <a
+href="http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/07/msg00538.html">answered</a>
+that the maintainers of <a
+href="http://cvs.debian.org/srcdep/Packages-arch-specific?cvsroot=dak">\
+Packages-arch-specific</a> need to be contacted.  Wouter Verhelst <a
+href="http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/07/msg00583.html">added</a> an
+explanation why the wanna-build database doesn't use control files but archive
+index files.</p>
+
+<p><strong>Managing Packages with Subversion.</strong> Marcus Better recently
+<a href="http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/07/msg00835.html">\
+started</a> to use <a href="http://packages.debian.org/subversion">\
+subversion</a> to maintain his packages and wondered what the recommended
+repository layout would be.  The point of having a common layout is that it
+would be possible to write support tools that make this layout less cumbersome
+to work with.</p>
+
+<p><strong>Creative Commons 3.0 Public Draft.</strong> Evan Prodromou <a
+href="http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2006/08/msg00051.html">reported</a>
+on the <a href="http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/6017">public</a> <a
+href="http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2006-August/003855.html">\
+draft</a> of the next version of Creative Commons licenses.  The changes from
+the 2.x version are largely due to an effort to make the licenses compatible
+with the Debian Free Software <a href="$(HOME)/social_contract#guidelines">\
+Guidelines</a> (DFSG).  He wondered if the anti-DRM requirement in the license
+draft, without a parallel distribution proviso, make it incompatible with the
+DFSG?</p>
+
 <p><strong>Security Updates.</strong> You know the drill.  Please make sure
 that you update your systems if you have any of these packages installed.</p>