[File-rc-users] init-system-helpers: file conflict with openrc: /usr/sbin/update-rc.d
Michael Biebl
biebl at debian.org
Fri Jan 22 14:08:32 UTC 2016
clone 811708 -1
reassign -1 file-rc
found -1 0.8.16
retitle -1 file conflict with init-system-helpers
thanks
I'm going to clone this bug report for file-rc, since it is equally
affected.
On Wed, 20 Jan 2016 10:07:36 +0100 Andreas Henriksson <andreas at fatal.se>
wrote:
> Hello Adam Borowski.
>
> Thanks for your bug report. I'm sorry I missed openrc.
>
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 01:46:08AM +0100, Adam Borowski wrote:
> > Package: init-system-helpers
> > Version: 1.25
> > Severity: serious
> > Justification: Policy 7.4
> >
> > Hi!
> >
> > Unpacking init-system-helpers (1.25) over (1.24) ...
> > dpkg: error processing archive /var/cache/apt/archives/init-system-helpers_1.25_all.deb (--unpack):
> > trying to overwrite '/usr/sbin/update-rc.d', which is also in package openrc 0.18.3-1
> >
> >
> > It's not a case of a simple move, as the file in openrc is different and has
> > openrc specific contents.
>
> It seems like openrc is following the old approach also taken by file-rc
> to fork and conflict as I understand it was in the old days recommended.
> (I'm not really sure that this was properly policy compliant. In my view
> the Conflict/Replaces needs to be set up in *both* directions, not only
> in one of the packages.)
>
> I think this is a bad approach and think the way upstart and systemd
> handled it by incorporating support in the same program is better.
>
> Some random reasons for this:
> - not everyone can conflict with sysv-rc (see e.g. systemd actually declaring
> a *dependency* on sysv-rc). And I think Conflicting with
> init-system-helpers will also be problematic.
> - just because openrc is installed doesn't mean openrc is actually running
> (specially not when the package is first installed and even if it's been
> rebooted and has claimed /sbin/init someone might have still overriden
> init via kernel cmdline).
> - keeping state in sync, eg. as done by systemd and sysvinit, so you can
> switch back and forward seems like it becomes more troublesome.
>
> Do you think it would be possible for open-rc to incorporate its
> invoke-rc.d and update-rc.d into the init-system-helpers version
> so we can all help out maintaining one version instead?
>
> If you still think it's better for openrc to ship its own versions of
> these programs, could you please consider switching to using a proper
> divert? If you could also runtime detect if openrc is actually running
> (how do you do that by the way?) and forward the calls to the diverted
> version if not would be good as well IMHO.
> A divert would have the benefit of also avoiding problems like the one
> you reported in the future, no matter which package ships the progams.
>
> I'm willing to help out on the init-system-helpers side if needed (although
> I'm not maintaining it).
>
> Which way do you think is best way forward?
--
Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the
universe are pointed away from Earth?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/file-rc-users/attachments/20160122/80e15053/attachment.sig>
More information about the File-rc-users
mailing list