Bug#506952: Conflicting package and joining effort.

[Anthony Wong]

2008/11/28 Christophe Monniez <christophe.monniez at fccu.be>

> Le vendredi 28 novembre 2008 à 09:10 +0100, Daniel Baumann a écrit :
> > about rifituti2..
> >
> > either both the source and binary package will be named rifituti2, then
> > we can upload this alongside to rifituti, and once it passed NEW, remove
> > rifituti. advantage: it's fair against previous upstream to not claim
> > his name and distinguish rifituti and rifituti2, disadvantage it has to
> > pass NEW and that will take a couple of weeks :/
> >
> > or we just name both source and binary package rifituti by 'hijacking'
> > that. i personally would not prefere this.
>
> s/rifituti/rifiuti/g
>
> I personally prefer the first solution too.
> I know some projects that use rifiuti (like ptk for exemple) that could
> be, one day, included in Debian. As those kind packages would depends on
> rifiuti, it's better to keep 1 and 2 alongside until all interesting
> projects have moved to rifiuti2.
>

Hi,

I've renamed the filename of the binary to rifiuti2, so there is no more
conflict between the two packages. Daniel, could you help me on checking my
package at http://ypwong.org/debian/rifiuti2/ please?

Anthony

p.s. I'm subscribed to this mailing list.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/forensics-devel/attachments/20081222/42e83815/attachment.htm