pHash library
Michael Prokop
mika at debian.org
Tue Dec 15 00:34:42 UTC 2009
* Tiago Bortoletto Vaz <tiago at debian.org> [20091215 01:18]:
> On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 07:18:21PM +0100, Michael Prokop wrote:
> > * Tiago Bortoletto Vaz <tiago at debian.org> [20091214 18:46]:
> > > Homepage: http://phash.org
> > > Vcs-Browser: http://git.debian.org/?p=forensics/libphash.git
> > > Vcs-Git: git://git.debian.org/forensics/libphash.git
> > The libs look ok to me. But libphash-samples maybe isn't perfect
> > yet:
> > * Binary names like test_video are calling for problems.
> > Are the binaries useful at all or would providing just the
> > cpp files be sufficient?
> > * Assuming the binaries should be shipped: there are no manpages
> > for all the provided binaries.
> > * I'd prefer something like phash-samples as package name for a
> > package providing binaries instead of lib*.
> Actually it doesn't make much sense to have a separeted -samples package.
> Binaries are not that useful, have strange names, are really small and there's
> no manpage nor even basic instructions about how to use them. That said, I'm
> going to ship such examples (maybe only .cpp files) with the -dev package.
> Please tell me if you disagree.
Sounds good. But instead of shipping the cpp files in the -dev
package I'd provide it as libphash-examples or libphash-doc.
regards,
-mika-
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/forensics-devel/attachments/20091215/3bf0a1bd/attachment.pgp>
More information about the forensics-devel
mailing list