Bug#848666: rkhunter: should recommend s-nail instead of heirloom-mailx - or not at all
mika at debian.org
Tue Dec 20 08:21:33 UTC 2016
* Jonas Smedegaard [Mon Dec 19, 2016 at 12:11:22PM +0100]:
> heirloom-mailx is now a transitional package depending on s-nail.
> S-nail does not offer same ABI as mailx (see bug#846062).
> If s-nail ABI is really supported, then rkhunter should recommend
> s-nail instead of heirloom-mailx, or else that part should be dropped.
> Severity set to serious for same reason as in bug#846062.
I don't think this qualifies for severity serious, especially
because it's not even a dependency but just a recommends.
Adjusting to important.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
More information about the forensics-devel