FreeBSD <sys/types.h>
Nicolas Souchu
nsouch@free.fr
Tue, 14 Dec 2004 21:55:57 +0100
On Sat, Dec 11, 2004 at 03:38:25PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
[...]
> Well it's not the same importing code into FreeBSD and adding compatibility
> chunks than adding compatibility chunks in order to export the code, but we
> end up with hacked code in both cases =).
In both cases, but it differs anyway :)
> OTOH, GNU projects are known for adapting themselves to other systems when
> they pretend to support them. The typical example is autoconf, and an extreme
> one are GCC's fixincludes hack. I would like to avoid hacking a fixincludes
> variant for Glibc for pollitical reasons as long as the technical reasons
> suggest to patch kFreeBSD headers, though.
>
> > An acceptable solution will only arrive when the constraint of having glibc
> > running on BSD systems will become necessary for both.
>
> Good point. Do you think having Glibc in ports would help? I don't know much
> FreeBSD (as a project) but I recall seeing programs in ports motivating changes
> in src in order to be supported.
Glibc in ports is a nice idea. I already suggested GNU/kFreeBSD bootstrapped
by a port.
> Even if we can't merge our patches with upstream, maintaining them is an itch
> we could live with. But if we can find a solution that upstream likes, that'd
> be much better! ;)
Bring glibc somehow in the place and wait for porters wanting to use it.
Nicholas