gnuab nuke list

[Guillem Jover]

On Sat, Jul 17, 2004 at 06:20:22PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 17, 2004 at 05:29:54AM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > > Package: ncurses
> > > Version: 5.3.20030719-4+cfh
> > > Version: 5.3.20030719-4+kbsd
> > 
> > There is a -4+cfg, it should be moved right?
> 
> It's not really +cfg but +cfh (as you can guess, this is a +cfg file that was
> added hacks, and dch incremented the version this weird way ;)

No, I meant there are those you pointed and that the 4+cfg as well.

> > > Package: netbsd
> > > Version: 1.6.1
> > > Version: 1.6.1-1
> > > Version: 1.6.1-2
> > > Version: 1.6.1-3
> > 
> > Binaries as well (it's now knetbsd right?).
> 
> No, 'netbsd' package has always been for userland. Anyway, you can remove
> both 'netbsd' and 'knetbsd' _source_ packages since they're just a dirty
> hack and will be made properly when I reinstate the knetbsd-gnu port anyway.

Ok I moved them already to obsolete.

> > > Package: freebsd-kernel
> > > Version: 5.1-1
> > 
> > Binaries as well (it's kfreebsd5 now).
> 
> I was expecting to come up with a separate list for binaries, but anyway..

Well then tell me before doing that, please, because it has been a
little pain to move that source list, I'd not do the same on a regular
basis for binaries, I'd implement binary outdating then. :>

The main idea with sources is that we want to move from source packages
to patches the same cannot be applied to binaries. =)

> > > Package: freebsd-libc5
> > > Version: 5.1-1
> > > Package: freebsd-make
> > > Version: 5.1-1
> 
> Nuke the binaries for these too. Both have been superceeded.

There were no binaries for those that I recall. :>

> > > Package: glibc
> > > Version: 2.3.1-18+kfreebsd.2
> > 
> > The binaries for that are missing, only one udeb.
> 
> Doesn't matter. glibc is 2.3-1+kbsd now.

Yeah moved them anyway. :>

I'll be removing old sources and old binaries that are currently on
obsolete in some months.

regards,
guillem