Fwd: Debian Installer etch beta 1 released
Petr Salinger
Petr.Salinger at t-systems.cz
Mon Nov 14 12:41:03 UTC 2005
> > for plan c) from
> > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/glibc-bsd-devel/2005-October/000568.html
>
> Uhm yes. But atm I think it's more important to decide which of the three plans
> I proposed in that mail we're going to follow. I think it didn't get any reply
> back then.. what's your opinion?
Well, I would choose b), but my opinion is completely unimportant.
I would expect there will be some requirements from ftpmasters, among them
rule "main must be rebuildable within main".
> > It will also prevent threads like
> > http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/11/thrd2.html#00541 .
> > I am afraid, that today kfreebsd glibc is not only unrebuildable,
> > but it is also without source, even in svn changelog is not 2.3-1+kbsd.11 mentioned.
> What do you mean? The source is in svn,
Last changelog entry in
http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/glibc-bsd/trunk/glibc-2.3/debian/changelog?op=file
is about 2.3-1+kbsd.10 not about 2.3-1+kbsd.11
> and also in the gnuab archive:
> http://ftp.gnuab.org/debian/pool-kfreebsd-i386/main/g/glibc/
There are glibc_2.3-1+kbsd.dsc and glibc_2.3-1+kbsd.diff.gz,
but again not current glibc_2.3-1+kbsd.11.dsc and glibc_2.3-1+kbsd.11.diff.gz
> > Could be i.e. kfreebsd-kernel-headers uploaded into experimental now ?
> > I think that NEW queue processing takes some days/weeks.
> And even if they agree to set the overrides, how would they be uploaded? dak
> rejects kfreebsd-i386 uploads, and source-only uploads too. How would you
> upload, say, kldutils?
> Maybe we can convince them with experimental, but:
>
> a) Technical problems with dak persist. What would you put in the
> Architecture field?
I haven't been aware about this.
> b) We need stuff in unstable. Having it in experimental is less useful than
> having it in unreleased.
Will be possible to have them in experimental AND unreleased
before day D (inclusion in official archive), and reuploaded
in official unstable after ?
Due to showed problems it might be better to wait before inclusion,
but problem with missing BTS will persist.
Petr
More information about the Glibc-bsd-devel
mailing list