ld.so path (was: Re: RFC: Changing ELFOSABI_FREEBSD into ELFOSABI_SYSV/ELFOSABI_NONE)

[Robert Millan]

On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 11:07:54AM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> >See also http://www.linuxbase.org/futures/ideas/multiarch/index.html
> >
> >What about /lib/ld-kfreebsd-i386.so.2 and /lib/ld-kfreebsd-amd64.so.2 ?
> Yes, that's the base of multi-arch. Currently bi-arch is implemented via 
>  /lib and /lib64, but that's not suitable for us. Maybe we will have to 
> speak with the multi-arch people in Debian to make sure we use the same 
> standars. There was a presentation of it at Debconf5.

Where are we on this?  x86_64-linux-gnu sets /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.X, so
by analogy we'd be /lib64/ld-kfreebsd-x86-64.so.X.

Is that ok?  We need to take a decision on this before patches for x86_64
support can be sent upstream.

-- 
Robert Millan