On 21/01/2015 03:44, NIIBE Yutaka wrote: > On 01/21/2015 10:30 AM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: >> I like the gnupg 2.1 designations (it's "rsa4096" instead of "4096R"), >> and would prefer to use them uniformly in related tools. > > Agreed. That's better. I will do that in 2.1. Thanks for that, I can only agree. -- Bertrand