[gopher] Gopher+ Status

[James Mills]

On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 7:01 AM, Cameron Kaiser <spectre at floodgap.com>
wrote:
>
> We've had a million of those, candidly. Most of them end up turning Gopher
> into an incompatible subset of HTTP, so hopefully your proposal will avoid
> that trap.
>

Yeah IHMO the Web (HTTP as it is) is inherently flawed and broken.

Isn't that why the W3C is coming up with HTTP 3.0 and Google some other
name I can't remember :)

cheers
James


James Mills / prologic

E: prologic at shortcircuit.net.au
W: prologic.shortcircuit.net.au
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/gopher-project/attachments/20141217/63a8f777/attachment-0001.html>