<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 8:29 AM, Cameron Kaiser <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:spectre@floodgap.com" target="_blank">spectre@floodgap.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex"><div id=":1jw" class="" style="overflow:hidden">I'm not opposed to Gopher over TLS, but I definitely would not want it to be<br>
mandatory, and it would increase client burden as well particularly with<br>
respect to certificate management.</div></blockquote></div><br>+1 on Gopher over TLS being optional.</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">gophers:// and port 7433?</div><div class="gmail_extra">(It doesn't seem to be taken according to the register[1])</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">cheers</div><div class="gmail_extra">James<br><br>[1]: <a href="https://www.iana.org/assignments/service-names-port-numbers/service-names-port-numbers.txt">https://www.iana.org/assignments/service-names-port-numbers/service-names-port-numbers.txt</a><br clear="all"><div><div class="gmail_signature"><span style="border-collapse:collapse;color:rgb(136,136,136);font-size:13px"><br><font face="arial, sans-serif">James Mills / prologic</font><br><br><font face="arial, sans-serif"></font><font face="'courier new', monospace">E: <a href="mailto:prologic@shortcircuit.net.au" style="color:rgb(0,0,204)" target="_blank">prologic@shortcircuit.net.au</a></font></span><div><span style="font-family:'courier new',monospace;color:rgb(136,136,136);font-size:13px">W: </span><a href="http://prologic.shortcircuit.net.au" style="font-family:'courier new',monospace;font-size:13px;color:rgb(0,0,204)" target="_blank">prologic.shortcircuit.net.au</a><br></div></div></div>
</div></div>