[kernel-sec-discuss] r1774 - active

[Michael Gilbert]

On Tue, 9 Mar 2010 10:43:24 -0700, dann frazier wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 11:38:56AM -0500, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> > On Tue,  9 Mar 2010 16:20:42 +0000, Dann Frazier wrote:
> > > Author: dannf
> > > Date: 2010-03-09 16:20:40 +0000 (Tue, 09 Mar 2010)
> > > New Revision: 1774
> > > 
> > > Modified:
> > >    active/CVE-2010-0298
> > > Log:
> > > debian status
> > > 
> > > Modified: active/CVE-2010-0298
> > > ===================================================================
> > > --- active/CVE-2010-0298	2010-03-09 16:12:53 UTC (rev 1773)
> > > +++ active/CVE-2010-0298	2010-03-09 16:20:40 UTC (rev 1774)
> > > @@ -6,8 +6,8 @@
> > >  Bugs:
> > >  upstream: needed
> > >  2.6.32-upstream-stable: needed
> > > -linux-2.6: needed
> > > +linux-2.6: released (2.6.32-8)
> > >  2.6.18-etch-security: N/A "kvm introduced in 2.6.25"
> > >  2.6.24-etch-security: N/A "kvm introduced in 2.6.25"
> > > -2.6.26-lenny-security: needed
> > > -2.6.32-squeeze-security: needed
> > > +2.6.26-lenny-security: released (2.6.26-21lenny3)
> > > +2.6.32-squeeze-security: released (2.6.32-8)
> > 
> > Dann,
> > 
> > i had recently checked against the patch that redhat says fixes this
> > (in their bug report), and found it to not be present in any of the
> > debian kernel source. is their information wrong?
> 
> What patch did you see?

oops, i found it.  i didn't think to look in the bugfix/x86
directory when i was looking.  the redhat patch is at:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2010-0298

mike