[kernel-sec-discuss] r1999 - active

Moritz Muehlenhoff jmm at alioth.debian.org
Mon Oct 25 09:24:28 UTC 2010


Author: jmm
Date: 2010-10-25 09:24:22 +0000 (Mon, 25 Oct 2010)
New Revision: 1999

Added:
   active/CVE-2010-3858
Removed:
   active/CVE-2010-64bit-dos
Log:
spender exploit CVEfied


Copied: active/CVE-2010-3858 (from rev 1998, active/CVE-2010-64bit-dos)
===================================================================
--- active/CVE-2010-3858	                        (rev 0)
+++ active/CVE-2010-3858	2010-10-25 09:24:22 UTC (rev 1999)
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+Candidate: needed
+Description:
+ Brad Spengler's 64bit_dos.c
+References:
+ http://grsecurity.net/~spender/64bit_dos.c
+ http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/08/27/1
+Notes:
+ related to CVE-2010-2240, but supposedly not completely fixed by the patches for that:
+ http://lists.immunitysec.com/pipermail/dailydave/2010-August/006171.html (5th paragraph)
+Bugs:
+upstream: needed
+2.6.32-upstream-stable: needed
+linux-2.6: needed
+2.6.26-lenny-security: needed
+2.6.32-squeeze-security: needed


Property changes on: active/CVE-2010-3858
___________________________________________________________________
Added: svn:mergeinfo
   + 

Deleted: active/CVE-2010-64bit-dos
===================================================================
--- active/CVE-2010-64bit-dos	2010-10-25 03:20:31 UTC (rev 1998)
+++ active/CVE-2010-64bit-dos	2010-10-25 09:24:22 UTC (rev 1999)
@@ -1,15 +0,0 @@
-Candidate: needed
-Description:
- Brad Spengler's 64bit_dos.c
-References:
- http://grsecurity.net/~spender/64bit_dos.c
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/08/27/1
-Notes:
- related to CVE-2010-2240, but supposedly not completely fixed by the patches for that:
- http://lists.immunitysec.com/pipermail/dailydave/2010-August/006171.html (5th paragraph)
-Bugs:
-upstream: needed
-2.6.32-upstream-stable: needed
-linux-2.6: needed
-2.6.26-lenny-security: needed
-2.6.32-squeeze-security: needed




More information about the kernel-sec-discuss mailing list