[kernel-sec-discuss] r2754 - active

Ben Hutchings benh at alioth.debian.org
Fri Sep 21 14:46:35 UTC 2012


Author: benh
Date: 2012-09-21 14:46:13 +0000 (Fri, 21 Sep 2012)
New Revision: 2754

Modified:
   active/CVE-2011-4915
   active/CVE-2011-4917
Log:
Remove incorrectly identified fixes for CVE-2011-491[57]

The upstream changes allow restricting read-access to per-process
directories, not to /proc/interrupts and /proc/stat.


Modified: active/CVE-2011-4915
===================================================================
--- active/CVE-2011-4915	2012-09-21 10:31:03 UTC (rev 2753)
+++ active/CVE-2011-4915	2012-09-21 14:46:13 UTC (rev 2754)
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
 Notes:
  jmm> This is unlikely to be fixed upstream
 Bugs:
-upstream: released (3.3) [0499680a42141d86417a8fbaa8c8db806bea1201, a2ef990ab5a6705a356d146dd773a3b359787497]
+upstream:
 2.6.32-upstream-stable: ignored "Minor information leak, not worth a backport and would need additional userspace changes"
 sid:
 2.6.32-squeeze-security: ignored "Minor information leak, not worth a backport and would need additional userspace changes"

Modified: active/CVE-2011-4917
===================================================================
--- active/CVE-2011-4917	2012-09-21 10:31:03 UTC (rev 2753)
+++ active/CVE-2011-4917	2012-09-21 14:46:13 UTC (rev 2754)
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
  https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/11/7/340
 Notes:
 Bugs:
-upstream: released (3.3) [0499680a42141d86417a8fbaa8c8db806bea1201, a2ef990ab5a6705a356d146dd773a3b359787497]
+upstream:
 2.6.32-upstream-stable: ignored "Minor information leak, not worth a backport and would need additional userspace changes"
 sid:
 2.6.32-squeeze-security: ignored "Minor information leak, not worth a backport and would need additional userspace changes"




More information about the kernel-sec-discuss mailing list