[kernel-sec-discuss] r5794 - active
Ben Hutchings
benh at moszumanska.debian.org
Tue Dec 19 22:42:16 UTC 2017
Author: benh
Date: 2017-12-19 22:42:16 +0000 (Tue, 19 Dec 2017)
New Revision: 5794
Modified:
active/CVE-2017-16538
active/CVE-2017-16644
active/CVE-2017-17449
Log:
Mark some issues pending/releaased upstream
Modified: active/CVE-2017-16538
===================================================================
--- active/CVE-2017-16538 2017-12-19 22:33:33 UTC (rev 5793)
+++ active/CVE-2017-16538 2017-12-19 22:42:16 UTC (rev 5794)
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
bwh> Probably introduced in 3.9 by commit b858c331cdf4 "[media] m88rs2000:
bwh> make use ts2020"
Bugs:
-upstream: needed
+upstream: pending [3d932ee27e852e4904647f15b64dedca51187ad7, 7bf7a7116ed313c601307f7e585419369926ab05]
4.9-upstream-stable: needed
3.16-upstream-stable: needed
3.2-upstream-stable: N/A "Vulnerable code not present"
Modified: active/CVE-2017-16644
===================================================================
--- active/CVE-2017-16644 2017-12-19 22:33:33 UTC (rev 5793)
+++ active/CVE-2017-16644 2017-12-19 22:42:16 UTC (rev 5794)
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
bwh> fixing this also fixes memory leaks on the failure path which
bwh> have been present for much longer.
Bugs:
-upstream: needed
+upstream: pending [c0f71bbb810237a38734607ca4599632f7f5d47f]
4.9-upstream-stable: needed
3.16-upstream-stable: N/A "Vulnerable code not present"
3.2-upstream-stable: N/A "Vulnerable code not present"
Modified: active/CVE-2017-17449
===================================================================
--- active/CVE-2017-17449 2017-12-19 22:33:33 UTC (rev 5793)
+++ active/CVE-2017-17449 2017-12-19 22:42:16 UTC (rev 5794)
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
bwh> The fix accepted upstream is the second version, which doesn't treat the
bwh> init namespace as special.
Bugs:
-upstream: needed
+upstream: released (4.15-rc4) [93c647643b48f0131f02e45da3bd367d80443291]
4.9-upstream-stable: needed
3.16-upstream-stable: needed
3.2-upstream-stable: ignored "Minor issue as user namespaces not supported"
More information about the kernel-sec-discuss
mailing list