[kernel] r21619 - dists/wheezy-security/linux/debian/patches/bugfix/s390

[Ben Hutchings]

Author: benh
Date: Wed Jul 23 00:58:52 2014
New Revision: 21619

Log:
Fix garbled sentence in backporting comment for s390-ptrace-fix-PSW-mask-check.patch

Modified:
   dists/wheezy-security/linux/debian/patches/bugfix/s390/s390-ptrace-fix-PSW-mask-check.patch

Modified: dists/wheezy-security/linux/debian/patches/bugfix/s390/s390-ptrace-fix-PSW-mask-check.patch
==============================================================================
--- dists/wheezy-security/linux/debian/patches/bugfix/s390/s390-ptrace-fix-PSW-mask-check.patch	Wed Jul 23 00:35:45 2014	(r21618)
+++ dists/wheezy-security/linux/debian/patches/bugfix/s390/s390-ptrace-fix-PSW-mask-check.patch	Wed Jul 23 00:58:52 2014	(r21619)
@@ -15,9 +15,9 @@
 Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky at de.ibm.com>
 [bwh: Backported to 3.2:
  - The PSW user-settable bitmasks are constant, never including PSW_MASK_RI
- - The kernel can run in either home or primary space, so instead that
-   the ASC bits are not equal PSW_ASC_HOME, we have to check that they
-   don't match psw_kernel_bits
+ - The kernel can run in either home or primary space, so instead of
+   checking that the ASC bits are not equal to PSW_ASC_HOME, we have to
+   check that they don't match psw_kernel_bits
  - For the same reason, the required values of non-user-settable bits
    are variables (psw_user_bits/psw32_user_bits) and remain so]
 Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben at decadent.org.uk>