[Letsencrypt-devel] Bug#827425: RFS: lacme/0.1-1 [ITP] -- ACME client written with process isolation and minimal privileges in mind

[Harlan Lieberman-Berg]

Harlan Lieberman-Berg <hlieberman at debian.org> writes:
> Guilhem Moulin <guilhem at guilhem.org> writes:
>> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "lacme"
>
> Hello Guilhem!
>
> This looks like a well-Debianized package to me.
>
> I'm curious about how you would differentiate a package like this from
> the other ACME clients out there -- I know specifically letskencrypt
> seems to fall in the same kind of category (highly isolated components;
> it uses pledge(2) and chroot(2) as well).
>
> I also want to make you aware of the Let's Encrypt Debain Packaging
> Team, in case you were interested in having the package be co-maintained
> with us (with the team in Uploaders), or maintained under that heading
> entirely (with the team in Maintainer).

CC the right bloody list this time, maybe.  Razzle frazzits

-- 
Harlan Lieberman-Berg
~hlieberman