Licensing of Lisaac

[Nicolas Boulay]

Goals:
- Mildred want to use BSD licence for there project.
- If a langage want to succeed it need to have the business market

So a GPL is good for the compiler. LGPL could be good for the lib.

But, we need also a specific clauses for the runtime lib of the
compiler like does gcc.

We need a specific clause on the LGPL to take into account the global
compilation mechanism of  Lisaac that make it impossible to change at
will the LGPL lib at runtime.

Regards,
Nicolas

2009/8/26 Jeremy Cowgar <jeremy at cowgar.com>:
>> So it's a very difficult question, and the debate is intense :-)
>
> It seems that the license has nothing to do with the formation of the
> association in France? I would like to take part in the debate.
>
> May I suggest that we forget about which license for a moment and agree
> upon what we want to allow to be done with Lisaac? Only when we have a
> clear definition of what we want to allow can we proceed with licensing
> debates.
>
> It would be like us all taking a trip to the north pole. We all agree we
> want to go to the north pole. So, someone starts debating airline
> tickets. However, some of the group wants to walk, another part wants to
> take a dog sled, another group snow machines and a final group they want
> to fly. Debating the airline tickets is the wrong thing to be debating.
>
> --
> Jeremy Cowgar <jeremy at cowgar.com>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Lisaac-devel mailing list
> Lisaac-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/lisaac-devel
>