Licensing of Lisaac

Nicolas Boulay nicolas.boulay at etherale.org
Wed Aug 26 13:53:36 UTC 2009


2009/8/26 Jeremy Cowgar <jeremy at cowgar.com>:
>> That's whaty i call "BSD licences" : they can be modified at will. So
>> Lisaac coulb became closed source like unix or spice with many
>> incompatible version on air. I think that should be avoided.
>
> The possibility of that happening is pretty small, I would think,
> although I could see your concern. We could use a MIT/BSD license that
> has a stipulation in regards to relicensing into another open source
> license only.

That's will be a nightmarre to defined "open source". LGPL is strong
for what is inside, and flexible for what is outside.

It's a well known licence. We can't create easly an all new licence.
It's a hard stuff.

>
> --
> Jeremy Cowgar <jeremy at cowgar.com>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Lisaac-devel mailing list
> Lisaac-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/lisaac-devel
>



More information about the Lisaac-devel mailing list