I'm sure absolutly all people here are agree about the idea that the programmer have to be free to choose his own licence and the licence of the lib does not have to force anyone to restrict is choice<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">
2009/8/26 Jeremy Cowgar <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:jeremy@cowgar.com">jeremy@cowgar.com</a>></span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class="im">> We know that already, and personally, if the licence of the library<br>
> isn't changed, I will develop an alternate library (perhaps not as<br>
> complete, I don't care so much about the GUI for example) with an<br>
> appropriate licence (Like the MIT licence).<br>
<br>
</div>That would be a shame to loose a developer to the task of doing all that<br>
duplicate work. I understand, but wow, let's try to ensure that will not<br>
happen! I, also, would not use a library that is licensed as GPL. For me,<br>
I'd probably cease using Lisaac if that were to become the case. Now....<br>
I mean unaltered GPL. I am unsure of the specific clauses that<br>
could/would be added to the GPL.<br>
<div><div></div><div class="h5"><br>
--<br>
Jeremy Cowgar <<a href="mailto:jeremy@cowgar.com">jeremy@cowgar.com</a>><br>
<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Lisaac-devel mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Lisaac-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org">Lisaac-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/lisaac-devel" target="_blank">http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/lisaac-devel</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>---------------------<br>Isaac Project - <a href="http://isaacproject.u-strasbg.fr/">http://isaacproject.u-strasbg.fr/</a><br>