[Logcheck-devel] Bug#212149: marked as done (logcheck: please consider defining DATE and HOSTNAME macros for use in rule files)
Debian Bug Tracking System
owner at bugs.debian.org
Thu Jul 15 08:18:13 UTC 2004
Your message dated Thu, 15 Jul 2004 10:04:11 +0200
with message-id <20040715080411.GD1849 at sputnik.stro.at>
and subject line logcheck: please consider defining DATE and HOSTNAME macros for use in rule files
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Sep 2003 11:05:45 +0000
>From mh+debian-bugs at zugschlus.de Mon Sep 22 06:05:41 2003
Return-path: <mh+debian-bugs at zugschlus.de>
Received: from de46d.ipsec0.torres.ka0.zugschlus.de (torres.ka0.zugschlus.de) [212.126.222.70]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1A1OVh-0007s7-00; Mon, 22 Sep 2003 06:05:41 -0500
Received: from [192.168.130.116] (port=33002 helo=vash.zugschlus.de)
by torres.ka0.zugschlus.de with esmtp (Exim 4.20 (Debian package 4.20-1tpl2))
id 1A1OVg-0007R1-DO; Mon, 22 Sep 2003 13:05:40 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Marc Haber <mh+debian-bugs at zugschlus.de>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit at bugs.debian.org>
Subject: logcheck: please consider defining DATE and HOSTNAME macros for use in rule
files
Bcc: Marc Haber <mh+debian-bugs at zugschlus.de>
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.29
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 11:05:40 +0000
Message-Id: <E1A1OVg-0007R1-DO at torres.ka0.zugschlus.de>
X-Broken-Reverse-DNS: no host name found for IP address 192.168.130.116
Delivered-To: submit at bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0
tests=HAS_PACKAGE
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_9_21
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_9_21 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
Package: logcheck
Version: 1.2.15
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
it would be easier to create "tighter" rules if logcheck would allow
to access local host name and the current date in rule files as macros.
Greetings
Marc
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux vash 2.4.22-ac1-asusacpi-vash #1 SMP Thu Sep 4 14:57:16 CEST 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
Versions of packages logcheck depends on:
ii cron 3.0pl1-80 management of regular background p
ii debconf 1.3.14 Debian configuration management sy
ii debianutils 2.5.5 Miscellaneous utilities specific t
ii exim [mail-trans 3.36-8 An MTA (Mail Transport Agent)
ii lockfile-progs 0.1.9 Programs for locking and unlocking
ii logcheck-databas 1.2.15 A database of system log rules for
ii logtail 1.2.15 Returns parts of logfiles that hav
ii mailx 1:8.1.2-0.20030521cvs-1 A simple mail user agent
ii sysklogd [system 1.4.1-11 System Logging Daemon
-- debconf information excluded
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 212149-done) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Jul 2004 08:04:13 +0000
>From max at sputnik.stro.at Thu Jul 15 01:04:13 2004
Return-path: <max at sputnik.stro.at>
Received: from baikonur.stro.at [213.239.196.228]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Bl1Dx-0003gg-00; Thu, 15 Jul 2004 01:04:13 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by baikonur.stro.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0C145C009
for <212149-done at bugs.debian.org>; Thu, 15 Jul 2004 10:04:12 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from baikonur.stro.at ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (baikonur [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 28902-09 for <212149-done at bugs.debian.org>;
Thu, 15 Jul 2004 10:04:11 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from sputnik (M897P018.adsl.highway.telekom.at [62.47.144.18])
by baikonur.stro.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id A60445C008
for <212149-done at bugs.debian.org>; Thu, 15 Jul 2004 10:04:11 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from max by sputnik with local (Exim 4.32)
id 1Bl1Dv-0001OB-Dc
for 212149-done at bugs.debian.org; Thu, 15 Jul 2004 10:04:11 +0200
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2004 10:04:11 +0200
From: maks attems <debian at sternwelten.at>
To: 212149-done at bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: logcheck: please consider defining DATE and HOSTNAME macros for use in rule files
Message-ID: <20040715080411.GD1849 at sputnik.stro.at>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="bajzpZikUji1w+G9"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040523i
Sender: maximilian attems <max at sputnik.stro.at>
X-Virus-Scanned: by Amavis (ClamAV) at stro.at
Delivered-To: 212149-done at bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
--bajzpZikUji1w+G9
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
hello marc,
closing that bug, as the duplicate #174331 has some sort of patch.
so the macro stuff has still an advocate in bts.
todd agreed.
on other news,
hope you are pleased by the recent progress of logcheck :)
a++ maks
--bajzpZikUji1w+G9
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFA9jp76//kSTNjoX0RAv1EAJ0VVcIrYSUJIfrM+iTiSN0UXK66YgCfYQdt
HPo96YszLY+K7Ei/RhjVmgk=
=F9jR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--bajzpZikUji1w+G9--
More information about the Logcheck-devel
mailing list