[Logcheck-devel] templates cleanup

[Gerfried Fuchs]

* maximilian attems <debian at sternwelten.at> [2004-05-18 21:32]:
> On Tue, 18 May 2004, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
>> #v+
>> - These directories may contain files named "logcheck" (containing minimal
>> + These directories may contain files prefixed with "logcheck" (containing minimal
>>   generic alert/override patterns), "(packagename)" (containing patterns
>>   specific to that one package) or "local" (created by the local
>> #v-
>> 
>>  I know this only because maks made the initial German translation along
>> these lines. From what I understood so far it is really meant that way.
> 
> isn't the prefix "logcheck-"?

 Ah, checked the source now, the prefix is logcheck- if I read the
source correctly.

> well the line with local is also not enterly correct,
> we both look for the file named "local" as for files prefixed local-.
> better just mention the prefix "local-", 
> so that people use local-exim and so on..

 Well, personally I don't see the need for different local files so I
would rather like to stick with local (and have it mentioned). So
basically we have this things:

 prefixed with logcheck-, named packagename, named local or prefixed
with local-

 Did I get it right this time?  So, that part needs a major rewrite to
represent the current state.

 I'll commit the other changes in the meantime.

 So long,
Alfie
-- 
Ok, da steckt auch nicht mehr Arbeit fuer mich hinter?  Dann bin ich's
doch.
                                  -- Joey in #debian.de
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/logcheck-devel/attachments/20040519/ef008309/attachment.pgp