[Logcheck-devel] The innd rule that wouldn't match..

Jamie L. Penman-Smithson jamie at silverdream.org
Fri Oct 8 04:21:53 UTC 2004


According to egrep this rule..

^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ innd: [-[:alnum:].]+:[0-9]+ (closed|
checkpoint) seconds [0-9]+ accepted [0-9]+ refused [0-9]+ rejected
[0-9]+ duplicate [0-9]+ accepted size [0-9]+ duplicate size [0-9]+$

..matches these log messages:

Sep 29 03:45:45 lorien innd: news.jgaa.com:35 closed seconds 3741
accepted 103 refused 84 rejected 6 duplicate 0 accepted size 393751
duplicate size 0

However, logcheck still reports them:

[...]
D: [1097209122] report : WARNING : can't exec /usr/bin/syslog-summary.
Running without summary
D: [1097209122] report: cat'ing - System Events
D: [1097209122] Setting the footer text
D: [1097209122] Sending report to STDOUT
This email is sent by logcheck. If you wish to no-longer receive it,
you can either deinstall the logcheck package or modify its
configuration file (/etc/logcheck/logcheck.conf).
[...]
Sep 26 16:54:22 lorien innd: gw.efnet.com:55 closed seconds 5 accepted
13 refused 11 rejected 0 duplicate 0 accepted size 24085 duplicate size
0
Sep 26 16:54:28 lorien innd: news.uhro.net:33 checkpoint seconds 124
accepted 1 refused 11 rejected 99 duplicate 0 accepted size 4841
duplicate size 0

I've fiddled with it for two days and still it won't work - so I'm
hoping some fresh eyes will spot the [probably] glaring mistake(?)

Thanks - glad to be on the team :)

-j

-- 
-jamie <jamie at silverdream.org> | spamtrap: spam at silverdream.org
 w: http://www.silverdream.org | p: sms at silverdream.org
 pgp key @ http://silverdream.org/~jps/pub.key
 04:30:01 up 13 days,  8:19, 17 users,  load average: 0.35, 0.24, 0.28

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/logcheck-devel/attachments/20041008/cfb1e173/attachment.pgp 


More information about the Logcheck-devel mailing list