[Logcheck-devel] The innd rule that wouldn't match..
Jamie L. Penman-Smithson
jamie at silverdream.org
Fri Oct 8 13:12:33 UTC 2004
On Fri, 2004-10-08 at 09:03 +0200, max attems wrote:
<snip>
> did you check permissions of the innd rules file?
Yup, it's fine:
-rw-r----- 1 root logcheck 5535 2004-10-07
01:33 /etc/logcheck/ignore.d.server/innd
> > Thanks - glad to be on the team :)
>
> saw your cvs ci, be gentle atm we are close to a release.
> that means please no code changes in src/!
> adding tested rules is ok.
Oops... sorry :/
-j
--
-jamie <jamie at silverdream.org> | spamtrap: spam at silverdream.org
w: http://www.silverdream.org | p: sms at silverdream.org
pgp key @ http://silverdream.org/~jps/pub.key
13:30:02 up 13 days, 17:19, 17 users, load average: 0.90, 0.64, 0.38
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/logcheck-devel/attachments/20041008/1fd001ea/attachment.pgp
More information about the Logcheck-devel
mailing list