Bug#270018: [Logcheck-devel] Bug#270018: logcheck specs for hylafax?

[maks attems]

hello guiseppe,

thanks for your quick response.

On Tue, 12 Oct 2004, Giuseppe Sacco wrote:

> Il mar, 2004-10-12 alle 11:33, maks attems ha scritto:
> > On Sat, 09 Oct 2004, Ross Boylan wrote:
> > 
> > [ snipped abusive non conclusive blabla ]
> > > ..
> > 
> > if you'd care about that bug, than you should have long ago,
> > tested the rules that jamie posted aboves 10 days ago!?
> > he may include those in logcheck-database if they work for you.

the strong words came out of the strange bug reporting style of
this logcheck user, sorry for the inconvinience.
 
> Unfortunatly, at the momet, I am unable to work at this bug, but, in two
> weeks, I might provide complete logs for sending and receiving faxes
> using the maximum available log level. I cannot do more, but if you
> think this would be enought then just tell me.

please not at maximum log level,
logcheck doesn't and will never filter max log level aka debug log level.
we care to filter _usual_ syslog lines that appear at default install.
thanks for your feedback, we will wait for your logs.


--
maks