Bug#343631: [Logcheck-devel] Bug#343631: logcheck-database: sudo: Ignore jobs from vc too?

Bill Wohler wohler at newt.com
Tue Jan 10 18:33:21 UTC 2006


Todd Troxell <ttroxell at debian.org> wrote:

> On Fri, Dec 16, 2005 at 09:56:39AM -0800, Bill Wohler wrote:
> > p.s. Does the "patch" tag literally mean patch with some automation
> > implications, or that a fix is included?
> 
> I am not sure what you mean by automation implications, but I suspect it's
> not that specific.
> 
> The official defintiion is:
> 
> "A patch or some other easy procedure for fixing the bug is included in the
> bug logs. If there's a patch, but it doesn't resolve the bug adequately or
> causes some other problems, this tag should not be used."

OK, I guess we can assume my one-liner would be considered an "easy
procedure." ;-)

-- 
Bill Wohler <wohler at newt.com>  http://www.newt.com/wohler/  GnuPG ID:610BD9AD
Maintainer of comp.mail.mh FAQ and MH-E. Vote Libertarian!
If you're passed on the right, you're in the wrong lane.





More information about the Logcheck-devel mailing list