Bug#360120: [Logcheck-devel] Bug#360120: logcheck-database: logcheck-sudo should treat sudoedit no worse than "sudo vi"

Jamie L. Penman-Smithson jamie at silverdream.org
Wed May 3 23:14:11 UTC 2006


package logcheck-database
tags 360120 pending
thanks

On 30 Mar 2006, at 18:48, Jan Braun wrote:
> logcheck does not report invocations of "sudo $EDITOR /some/file",  
> while it
> does report "sudoedit /some/file". That's obviously inconsistent.
> The patch below fixes it (by ignoring sudoedit, too).
<snip>

Thanks for the patch. This will be included in the next release.

Thanks for your bug report,

-- 
-Jamie L. Penman-Smithson <jamie at silverdream.org>
  PGP: C0A7 955E EED6 A309 23D7 863B C76A 26A3 F0DC FCA8
  never send mail to: oubliette.z at gmail.com


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PGP.sig
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 186 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/logcheck-devel/attachments/20060504/9dc659df/attachment.pgp 


More information about the Logcheck-devel mailing list