[Logcheck-devel] final decision on violations.ignore.d and de-escalation
martin f krafft
madduck at debian.org
Wed Sep 13 16:35:02 UTC 2006
Hi guys,
I have the feeling that we have not yet reached consensus on what
violations.ignore.d should be:
- a set of filters that apply to violations; any line filtered
will disappear completely from the logcheck mails
- a set of filters that apply to violations; any line filtered
will automatically be de-escalated to a normal system event.
I think we must figure this out before etch. Could you please offer
your input?
If I don't hear anything before next week, I will assume that we
want de-escalation, which seems to be the current way things are
going.
(logcheck is so ready for a rewrite from scratch...)
--
.''`. martin f. krafft <madduck at debian.org>
: :' : proud Debian developer, author, administrator, and user
`. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduck http://debiansystem.info
`- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
always remember you're unique, just like everyone else.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature (GPG/PGP)
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/logcheck-devel/attachments/20060913/7f5c6504/attachment.pgp
More information about the Logcheck-devel
mailing list