[Logcheck-devel] Bug#445473: Updated patch for policyd-weight ignores

[Sami Haahtinen]

On Sun, 2008-03-16 at 22:36 +0200, Sami Haahtinen wrote:
> On Sun, 2008-03-16 at 12:58 -0400, Frédéric Brière wrote:
> > Your log didn't include an example for "temporarily blocked" and
> > "multirecipient email", but those were clear enough anyway.  I also
> > added "please relay via your ISP", which was not covered by your patch.
> > 
> > I was intrigued by your making optional of one space and all of
> > client/helo/from/to in the "weighted check" rule.  Was that intentional?
> 
> I'm pretty sure there was a reason for that, but it could be that it was
> a leftover from some variation of the rule. You can leave it out and
> i'll file a new bug if it's required.

Hmm.. after re-reading that all, i was of course referring to the first
optional space.

The client/helo/... is optional because it's not always included in the
"decided action=PREPEND" form. I faintly remember considering using 2
sets of rules for those lines but decided against it for some reason.

- S

-- 
Sami Haahtinen <ressu at ressukka.net>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/logcheck-devel/attachments/20080316/6c5982b4/attachment.pgp