[Ltrace-devel] PPC32 build fix, and other minor fixes suggested for 0.6.0

[Joe Damato]

On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 9:53 AM, Michael K. Edwards
<m.k.edwards at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 12:10 AM, Joe Damato <ice799 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Thanks for your work on this. I'll apply these patches and test. No
>> need to do this now, but in the future can you please send each patch
>> as a separate email to the list (checkout git send-email) to make it
>> easier to comment on specific patches?
>
> Will do; these were extracted on a lab machine with no direct net
> access, so I did the lazy thing and sent them from GMail.  I'll get my
> act together :-)

Just noticed that the author tags on these patches are kinda funky:

Author: michaedw in build chroot <build at ctbu-bld5.cisco.com>

Would you mind resubmitting your patches with corrected author name /
email address and omitting the autoupdate patch?

>> All the patches look OK except patch 4. Is there a reason we need to
>> update to autoconf 2.65? Doing so makes running autoreconf fail on
>> some linux distributions with older versions of autoconf. I don't
>> think we're using any features from 2.65, are we?
>
> No, that just eliminated some sort of warning due to AC_PROG_LIBTOOL
> being deprecated in favor of LT_INIT.  I'm sure it's fine without it.
>
> Thanks for taking these under consideration; I look forward to a 0.6.0
> release.  (I'm still working on better Thumb2 support, but that can go
> in 0.6.1.)  I'm about to fire off a whole slew of suggested updates to
> crosstool-ng, but I'm holding off so that the ltrace update can appear
> as a new version number rather than a gimongous patch.
>
> Cheers,
> - Michael
>