[Ltrace-devel] 0.7.0 released
Petr Machata
pmachata at redhat.com
Mon Nov 12 20:58:43 UTC 2012
Andreas Schwab <schwab at linux-m68k.org> writes:
> Petr Machata <pmachata at redhat.com> writes:
>
>> Then perhaps it's a kernel that I haven't tested on.
>
> This has nothing to do with the kernel, the list is maintained by
> ld.so.
OK. I didn't know where the VDSO name exactly comes from. Turns out
recent vanilla ustream sets l_name for VDSO always and the distribution
glibc in Fedora only when dl_debug_mask is set (e.g. LD_DEBUG=unused).
> You get no directory part at all with "LD_LIBRARY_PATH=:".
Hmm, we can't compare l_addr either, that's bias, and therefore not
unique. GDB in Fedora carries a patch for ignoring entries named
linux-{vdso,gate}.so.1, so let's go with that for now. This fixes the
problem per my testing.
Thanks,
PM
More information about the Ltrace-devel
mailing list