[Ltrace-devel] [PATCH] Update m68k syscall table
pmachata at redhat.com
Thu Sep 13 15:15:25 UTC 2012
Andreas Schwab <schwab at linux-m68k.org> writes:
> Petr Machata <pmachata at redhat.com> writes:
>> Andreas Schwab <schwab at linux-m68k.org> writes:
>>> - "break", /* 17 */
>>> + "17", /* 17 */
>> Do you know what the deal is here? Why are we giving up a syscall name?
>> Did Linux discontinue use of those, and if so, when? I.e., couldn't
>> ltrace legitimately be run on a kernel that still uses system call
>> number 17? (We need at least a 2.6 kernel to run.)
> These syscalls never existed in the history of Linux/m68k, that's why
> they were removed recently.
OK, good. I'll apply the patch.
More information about the Ltrace-devel