[Ltrace-devel] 0001-Fix-FAIL-in-attach-process-tests.patch

[Ivan Zakharyaschev]

Hello!

It would be more natural just to declare this test (of a feature which 
has not yet been implemented) as "X-FAIL"; I mean: which is expected to 
fail. It will always be run, and in future, if something changes, we'll 
notice the change in the test results and act accordingly.

Does the testing system (dejagnu?) has a way to say that a test is 
expected not to pass, but to fail (and not count it as a real failure)?

(A switch like a define is better suited to reflect the features of the 
environment, external to our project; as an advice for the other patch: 
perhaps, whether we have the debuginfo for glibc available could be 
reflected by a "switch".)

-- 
Best regards,
Ivan
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 0001-Fix-FAIL-in-attach-process-tests.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 1535 bytes
Desc: 
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/ltrace-devel/attachments/20171123/7e496d84/attachment.bin>