[Neurodebian-devel] OpenSesame 0.27

[Sebastiaan Mathot]

Great! I see 0.27 has landed in NeuroDebian. I have on small request regarding 
the listing. Could your perhaps change the citable reference to:

	Mathôt, S., Schreij, D., & Theeuwes, J. (2012). OpenSesame: An open-source, 
graphical experiment builder for the social sciences. Behavior Research 
Methods, 44(2), 314-324. DOI:10.3758/s13428-011-0168-7

For future reference: Is the preferred procedure for updating OpenSesame that 
I prepare and upload the package to mentors and then ask you guys via the 
mailing list to upload it to (neuro)debian?

Thanks!

On Saturday, December 15, 2012 10:57:15 PM Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
> uploading to debian unstable (it will have to get through NEW queue first
> which might take a while and even could be rejected if critical issues
> found) and neurodebian (where built) now:
> 
> opensesame_0.27-1_amd64.build   OK      3:17.51 real, 33.23 user, 78.44 sys,
> 1310488 out opensesame_0.27-1~nd60+1_amd64.build    OK      2:58.83 real,
> 24.30 user, 65.27 sys, 974096 out opensesame_0.27-1~nd70+1_amd64.build   
> OK      3:58.09 real, 33.74 user, 71.92 sys, 1303504 out
> opensesame_0.27-1~nd+1_amd64.build      OK      3:43.01 real, 34.05 user,
> 76.82 sys, 1321976 out opensesame_0.27-1~nd10.10+1_amd64.build OK     
> 7:02.58 real, 26.18 user, 85.96 sys, 1031216 out
> opensesame_0.27-1~nd10.04+1_amd64.build OK      5:21.11 real, 42.21 user,
> 222.65 sys, 888496 out opensesame_0.27-1~nd11.04+1_amd64.build FAILED 
> 3:26.06 real, 29.60 user, 42.30 sys, 722192 out
> opensesame_0.27-1~nd11.10+1_amd64.build OK      4:09.73 real, 34.30 user,
> 47.13 sys, 1228304 out opensesame_0.27-1~nd12.04+1_amd64.build OK     
> 3:43.23 real, 33.71 user, 46.90 sys, 1129488 out
> opensesame_0.27-1~nd12.10+1_amd64.build OK      3:19.91 real, 29.09 user,
> 43.61 sys, 1120680 out
> 
> CHEERS!
> 
> On Sat, 15 Dec 2012, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
> > I am changing through version back to 0.27-1 (as is in git, and as it
> > should be to avoid all additional pain) from -2 (as was uploaded to
> > mentors)
> > 
> > On Sat, 15 Dec 2012, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
> > > On Sat, 15 Dec 2012, Sebastiaan Mathot wrote:
> > > > > > And, indeed, my version of cme is old: 2.005-1. Does the warning
> > > > > > that you
> > > > > > get refer to line 15 of debian/copyright? And is it a problem?
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 	License: Apache-2.0
> > > > > 
> > > > > nope -- you did define it . the only problem as with having
> > > > > Licenses:
> > > > 
> > > > > instead of License:
> > > > I'm having some trouble parsing the grammer of this sentence. ;-) If
> > > > there's something I should do, please spell it out for me.
> > > 
> > > nevermind -- it was just the answer to your question on "is it a
> > > problem" and the answer was "nope" ;)
> > > 
> > > > > so add --no-info  and specify the name with '-n "brief description
> > > > > for
> > > > > opensesame"' so manpage becomes sensible
> > > > 
> > > > Check.
> > > > 
> > > > > then just reupload to mentors and I will get it from there, build,
> > > > > upload
> > > > 
> > > > Check.
> > > 
> > > awesome!
> > > 
> > > looked at the diff though:
> > > 
> > > -0.27 \- manual page for 0.27 'Frisky Freud'
> > > +0.27 \- Graphical experiment builder for the social sciences (runtime)
> > > 
> > > I thought it would be
> > > 
> > > opensesame \- ...
> > > 
> > > not sure why -- my wild guess is that help2man decided to be intelligent
> > > and assume that two piece output of --version is the "NAME VERSION" so
> > > took 0.27 for the name... worth filing a bugreport against help2man
> > > imho and possibly fixing manpage meanwhile manually to have proper
> > > naming embedded... but that should not stop us from uploading -- will
> > > build/upload today if nothing else pop out.
> > > 
> > > THANKS!
> > > 
> > > > - <https://mentors.debian.net/package/opensesame>
> > > > - <https://github.com/smathot/OpenSesame/tree/debian>
-- 
http://www.cogsci.nl/smathot