[Neurodebian-devel] [psignifit-devel] [ftpmaster at debian.org: psignifit_3.0~beta.20120503.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED]
Hänel Nikolaus Valentin
valentin.haenel at epfl.ch
Wed May 23 13:04:35 UTC 2012
* Yaroslav Halchenko <debian at onerussian.com> [2012-05-23]:
> as long as new pypsignifit (would that be a 'source' name?) does not provide
> functionality (i.e. cmdline tool) present in good old psignifit it would be
> logical indeed to carry both since psignifit is relatively popular or at
> least installed on quite a number of computers:
>
> http://qa.debian.org/popcon.php?package=psignifit
Yeah, Michael looked at that, and said it was due to Debian Med
installations. If you dicount those, its neglegible.
> So, Valentin, I guess I should expect a fresh source package some time soon,
> right? ;)
Well... I guess so.. I still think pypsignifit is not a good idea, since
the source package may at somepoint also provide mpsignifit, rpsignifit
and psignifit-cli.
V-
More information about the Neurodebian-devel
mailing list