[Nm-templates-discuss] templates nm_pp.txt,1.45,1.46
joerg@haydn.debian.org
joerg@haydn.debian.org
Update of /cvsroot/nm-templates/templates
In directory haydn:/tmp/cvs-serv21873
Modified Files:
nm_pp.txt
Log Message:
Added DFSG FAQ.
Rebuild the bad.licenses.tar.bz2 and changed the question a bit for it.
Index: nm_pp.txt
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/nm-templates/templates/nm_pp.txt,v
retrieving revision 1.45
retrieving revision 1.46
diff -u -d -r1.45 -r1.46
--- nm_pp.txt 4 Nov 2004 22:50:20 -0000 1.45
+++ nm_pp.txt 21 Nov 2004 18:07:45 -0000 1.46
@@ -33,11 +33,11 @@
http://www.washington.edu/pine/overview/legal.html)
5. At http://people.debian.org/~joerg/bad.licenses.tar.bz2 you can
- find a tarball of 4 bad licenses. Please compare these licenses
- with the first nine points of the DFSG and show what changes would
- be needed to make them DFSG-free. There's no need to compare word
- for word (which would be impossible for some licenses anyway), but
- you should spot the biggest mistakes.
+ find a tarball of bad licenses. Please compare the graphviz and two
+ other (your choice) licenses with the first nine points of the DFSG
+ and show what changes would be needed to make them DFSG-free.
+ There's no need to compare word for word (which would be impossible
+ for some licenses anyway), but you should spot the biggest mistakes.
5a. The GNU Free Documentaion License (FDL) has been heavily discussed
on debian-legal recently. Please read
@@ -279,3 +279,6 @@
http://people.debian.org/~igloo/status.php
Watch your package status.
+
+ http://people.debian.org/~bap/dfsg-faq.html
+ DFSG and Software License FAQ