[Nm-templates-discuss] templates nm_pp.txt,1.45,1.46

joerg@haydn.debian.org joerg@haydn.debian.org


Update of /cvsroot/nm-templates/templates
In directory haydn:/tmp/cvs-serv21873

Modified Files:
	nm_pp.txt 
Log Message:
Added DFSG FAQ.
Rebuild the bad.licenses.tar.bz2 and changed the question a bit for it.


Index: nm_pp.txt
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/nm-templates/templates/nm_pp.txt,v
retrieving revision 1.45
retrieving revision 1.46
diff -u -d -r1.45 -r1.46
--- nm_pp.txt	4 Nov 2004 22:50:20 -0000	1.45
+++ nm_pp.txt	21 Nov 2004 18:07:45 -0000	1.46
@@ -33,11 +33,11 @@
     http://www.washington.edu/pine/overview/legal.html)
 
  5. At http://people.debian.org/~joerg/bad.licenses.tar.bz2 you can
-    find a tarball of 4 bad licenses. Please compare these licenses
-    with the first nine points of the DFSG and show what changes would
-    be needed to make them DFSG-free. There's no need to compare word
-    for word (which would be impossible for some licenses anyway), but
-    you should spot the biggest mistakes.
+    find a tarball of bad licenses. Please compare the graphviz and two
+    other (your choice) licenses with the first nine points of the DFSG
+    and show what changes would be needed to make them DFSG-free.
+	There's no need to compare word for word (which would be impossible
+    for some licenses anyway), but you should spot the biggest mistakes.
 
 5a. The GNU Free Documentaion License (FDL) has been heavily discussed
     on debian-legal recently. Please read
@@ -279,3 +279,6 @@
 
  http://people.debian.org/~igloo/status.php
             Watch your package status.
+
+ http://people.debian.org/~bap/dfsg-faq.html
+			DFSG and Software License FAQ