[Nm-templates-discuss] templates nm_pp1.txt,1.6,1.7

[tbm at haydn.debian.org]

Update of /cvsroot/nm-templates/templates
In directory haydn:/tmp/cvs-serv16230

Modified Files:
	nm_pp1.txt 
Log Message:
The FDL discussion is over, thanks Anthony DeRobertis <anthony at derobert.net>


Index: nm_pp1.txt
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/nm-templates/templates/nm_pp1.txt,v
retrieving revision 1.6
retrieving revision 1.7
diff -u -d -r1.6 -r1.7
--- nm_pp1.txt	31 Mar 2006 17:51:48 -0000	1.6
+++ nm_pp1.txt	5 Apr 2006 14:49:12 -0000	1.7
@@ -47,11 +47,10 @@
     for some licenses anyway), but you should spot the biggest mistakes.
 
 5a. The GNU Free Documentation License (FDL) has been heavily discussed
-    on debian-legal recently. Please read
-    http://people.debian.org/~srivasta/Position_Statement.html and
-    briefly explain how you feel about including documents
-    licensed under the FDL in main and what the consequences of this
-    position might be for Debian.
+    on debian-legal in the past, leading to a GR, see
+    http://www.debian.org/vote/2006/vote_001.  What is your opinion about
+    how the DFSG should be applied to parts of an application that are
+    not source code, such as documentation, firmware, image, etc?
 
 5b. How do *you* check if a license is DFSG-compatible?