[Nm-templates-discuss] templates nm_pp1.txt,1.5,1.6

[myon at haydn.debian.org]

Update of /cvsroot/nm-templates/templates
In directory haydn:/tmp/cvs-serv8944

Modified Files:
	nm_pp1.txt 
Log Message:
requirements of the different sections, reformulate dfsg tests

Index: nm_pp1.txt
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/nm-templates/templates/nm_pp1.txt,v
retrieving revision 1.5
retrieving revision 1.6
diff -u -d -r1.5 -r1.6
--- nm_pp1.txt	17 Sep 2005 10:22:45 -0000	1.5
+++ nm_pp1.txt	31 Mar 2006 17:51:48 -0000	1.6
@@ -36,7 +36,8 @@
     and free beer? Is Debian mainly about free speech or free beer?
 
  4. What are the sections of Debian software and the differences between
-    them? How would you decide where to put a new package?
+    them? How would you decide where to put a new package? Which requirements
+    do the packages in the sections have to meet?
 
  5. At http://people.debian.org/~joerg/bad.licenses.tar.bz2 you can
     find a tarball of bad licenses. Please compare the graphviz and three
@@ -55,8 +56,8 @@
 5b. How do *you* check if a license is DFSG-compatible?
 
 5c. There are a few "tests" for this purpose, based on (not really) common
-    situations. Do you know one (or more) of these? Explain it/them to me
-    and point out which common problems can be discovered by it/them.
+    situations. Explain them to me and point out which common problems can
+    be discovered by them.
 
  6. Are there any sections of the DFSG or Social Contract that you
     might like to see changed? If so, which ones, and why?