[PKG-OpenRC-Debian] Bug#817006: Bug#817006: ack to NMU
Benda Xu
heroxbd at gentoo.org
Tue Mar 8 10:58:39 UTC 2016
Hi Adam,
Adam Borowski <kilobyte at angband.pl> writes:
> The popcon for openrc is 83, which, assuming that 10% of users run popcon
> (a wild-ass guess) means 830 users. I have no idea what part of this is
> unstable, but as openrc in Debian is quite experimental, I guess quite a
> bunch of such users are affected.
>
> The breakage is pretty severe -- it does match the description of "critical"
> after all. Every affected user would have to research the fix and apply
> it manually. Thus, I don't think it's a good idea to ignore this bug,
> especially that the fix is easy.
Okay, I will take this lesson. Thank you for your help!
>> That said, I understand theoretically your NMU is the correctly way to
>> go. So if you intend to do so, consider this email as an ack to NMU
>> from the maintainer team.
>
> I'll upload it then.
Great! It is in Sid now.
>> One thing to notice is that we are tracking the package at
>>
>> http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/openrc/openrc.git
>>
>> Would you mind if I ask you to prepare a commit to the master
>> corresponding to the NMU?
>
> Of course. I don't have push rights to that repository, so two commits are
> attached to this mail (one for the fix, one for changelog).
Applied and pushed.
You could apply at
https://alioth.debian.org/projects/openrc
to get push rights.
>> BTW, if you are interested in OpenRC, you are welcomed to join the
>> maintenance team.
>
> I'm afraid I don't really know inner workings of openrc, I use it on only
> one machine (which happens to be my main desktop, but still...). Everywhere
> else I'm on sysv-rc.
Ah-ha. Me too, desktops, laptops or newly installed servers (those I
could access the consoles).
> This said, keeping openrc viable seems important for resisting
> systemd-ization of Debian so I probably should help in _some_ way.
Agreed.
>> 1. 0.20.4-1 was uploaded in a hurry to keep itself in testing. The pts
>> system lied and we did not make it. divert should not have existed in
>> OpenRC.
>
> It can be removed in some time, after the affected systems are fixed.
Okay.
Also I would like to thank Andreas for pointing this out.
Yours,
Benda
More information about the OpenRC-devel
mailing list