[Openstack-devel] nova_2013.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

[Ola Lundqvist]

Hi

I agree with Medhi and Thomas about this. I do not want to
repeat the reasons as Thomas have already expressed them clearly. :-)

Separate packages have clearly advantages in this case.

// Ola

On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 11:54:19AM +0200, Mehdi Abaakouk wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> > On 04/11/2013 06:04 AM, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> > Adding lots of tiny packages where the metadata has
> > more size than the actual use data of the package is bad enough that it
> > warrants a reject. Independent of our knowledge of the package -
> > thats why you can just explain stuff if its really needed.
> 
> I use this packaging for many different kind of architecture.
> I also think having the current binary packages for Nova is needed.
> I don't want to deal with enabled/disabled rc scripts or
> complicated /etc/default/nova to set which part of nova I want to run on
> a cluster node. Installing one package to enable one service match the 
> distributed architecture nature of Openstack and made the Openstack
> installation easier.
> 
> Regards,
> -- 
> Mehdi Abaakouk
> mail: sileht at sileht.net
> irc: sileht



> _______________________________________________
> Openstack-devel mailing list
> Openstack-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/openstack-devel


-- 
 --------------------- Ola Lundqvist ---------------------------
/  opal at debian.org                     Annebergsslingan 37      \
|  ola at inguza.com                      654 65 KARLSTAD          |
|  http://inguza.com/                  +46 (0)70-332 1551       |
\  gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36  4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9 /
 ---------------------------------------------------------------