[Parted-edge] Re: [parted-devel] Darcs performance (mainly memory usage)

[leslie.polzer at gmx.net]

On Wed, Nov 15, 2006 at 10:27:54AM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:

> I would move to git if we would move to another one.
I'd consider either git, monotone or Mercurial.  Have to read up on
those again if we need to move.

> Would be good if you could upgrade your darcs to check if it solves
> the problem.
We have 1.0.8, which is the latest release.

> I personally don't like how bzr output its logs and it also miss tags
> so I think it's a no option for now.
I don't like bzr either, although I forgot the reasons.

  Leslie

-- 
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys DD4EBF83
http://nic-nac-project.de/~skypher/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/parted-edge/attachments/20061115/d7c8b9a4/attachment.pgp