Bug#526471: cleaned up patch for bug #526471

[Junichi Uekawa]

I think you haven't responded to my initial comments. I don't want to
review a patch that doesn't reflect my comments.

At Wed, 21 Oct 2009 23:35:34 +0200,
Francesco Poli wrote:
> 
> [1  <multipart/signed (7bit)>]
> [1.1  <text/plain; US-ASCII (quoted-printable)>]
> On Fri, 14 Aug 2009 23:09:13 +0200 Francesco Poli wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, 16 Jul 2009 23:17:02 +0200 Francesco Poli (t1000) wrote:
> > 
> > > Hi,
> > > two new versions of pbuilder have been uploaded to unstable without
> > > incorporating my patch to fix bug #526471.
> > > 
> > > What's wrong with my patch?
> > > If it was rejected, I would like to know why, so that I can possibly
> > > prepare a new rectified patch...
> > > 
> > > May I have some sort of response from the Debian pbuilder maintenance
> > > team?
> > > 
> > > 
> > > In the meanwhile, I am sending a new cleaned up version of my patch
> > > (prepared against the current public git repository).
> > > Please apply it as soon as possible.
> > > 
> > > N.B.: as indicated in the patch itself, my changes are released
> > >       under the same terms as pbuilder (GPL v2 or later).
> > 
> > 
> > Again, may I have a reply from the Debian pbuilder maintenance team?
> 
> It seems that I do not even deserve an answer...   :-(
> This is *really* frustrating!
> 
> How am I supposed to contribute to pbuilder, if nobody even cares to
> reply to bug reports submitted along with patches?!?
> 
> 
> -- 
>  New location for my website! Update your bookmarks!
>  http://www.inventati.org/frx
> ..................................................... Francesco Poli .
>  GnuPG key fpr == C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12  31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4
> [1.2  <application/pgp-signature (7bit)>]
> 
> [2  <text/plain; us-ascii (7bit)>]
> _______________________________________________
> Pbuilder-maint mailing list
> Pbuilder-maint at lists.alioth.debian.org
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pbuilder-maint