Please add freeze exception for darcs-monitor

[Joachim Breitner]

Hi,

Am Donnerstag, den 09.09.2010, 10:45 -0300 schrieb Marco Túlio Gontijo e
Silva:
> Hi Joachim.
> 
> Excerpts from Joachim Breitner's message of Qui Set 09 10:30:32 -0300 2010:
> (...)
> > Implement such changes in experimental, or wait for after the release (or at
> > least until it is unlikely that we are changing squeeze through unstable) and
> > then do the stuff in unstable?
> 
> Well, sounds like the same to me from the release perspective.  Am I missing
> something?

It the question: Bother with experimental (and thus two versions to care
about, wondering how we best handle that with the darcs repos)? Or wait
(and fix RC bugs in the meanwhile :-)).

I’m not too fond of using experimental and would not mind waiting, but I
don’t want to hold anyone back.

I guess we need a directory darcs.debian.org/pkg-haskell/experimental
for the experimental branches then. I’m not sure how PET can handle
that. Probably easiest to just run a a second PET instance, only seeing
the repos in experimental. @pet-devel: Is PET set up to track two
branches of one package in the VCS?

Greetings,
Joachim

-- 
Joachim "nomeata" Breitner
Debian Developer
  nomeata at debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C
  JID: nomeata at joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pet-devel/attachments/20100909/4d3a6e80/attachment.pgp>