packages wrongly tagged as having debian/watch problems
Cédric Boutillier
cedric.boutillier at gmail.com
Fri Jan 6 14:48:14 UTC 2012
Dear PET Developers,
It was noticed that in the summary of PET monitoring pkg-ruby-extras git
repository [1], some packages have "NotFound" in the Upstream columns.
This is the case of most of those listed in the "Problems with
debian/watch" section. However many (all?) of them have a working
debian/watch, and uscan reports correctly information about upstream.
I notice that the majority of the affected packages point to the
githubredir service [2], but not only (some to rubyforge (ex: redmine)
or other websites (ex: ruby-ncurses)). Those using gemwatch [3] seem
unaffected.
Have you an idea of what could cause the problem? What could we do to
avoid/solve this issue?
Thank you!
[1] http://pet.debian.net/pkg-ruby-extras/pet.cgi
[2] http://githubredir.debian.net/
[3] http://pkg-ruby-extras.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/gemwatch/
Best regards,
Cédric
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pet-devel/attachments/20120106/e0606db9/attachment.pgp>
More information about the PET-devel
mailing list