[Pkg-ace-devel] [ciao-users] CIAO questions ...
Konstantinos Margaritis
markos@debian.gr
Mon, 6 Sep 2004 00:05:49 +0300
On Παρ 03 Σεπ 2004 01:10, Thomas Girard wrote:
> 1. Switching to ACE 5.4.2
> =========================
>
> I have split my monolithic patch against ACE 5.4.2 into smaller,
> cleaner, logical pieces to ease integration with dpatch. These
> patches are available in
> http://thomas.g.girard.free.fr/ace/patches.
Ok, I'll take a look at them during the week, right now my schedule is
very busy unfortunately.
> I haven't tried recompiling Debian packages since this split. I
> will tomorrow and let you know if I encounter any problem.
Ok, I'd like to hear how that goes. Basically Brian Nelson the other
ACE co-maintainer was working on exactly using dpatch on the
packages, but I can't seem to be able to reach him lately. Brian, are
you reading this?
> Noteworthy stuff :
> * There is a package named `mpc' on mentors.debian.net. Following
> gperf example maybe mpc should be renamed to mpc-ace.
Agreed.
> * X and/or Qt reactor were completely removed.
Hm, perhaps we should allow the creation of extra packages using mpc
makefiles, but I have no experience with mpc whatsoever so I would
appreciate any help. It would be handy to provide extra packages for
those who use these reactors.
> * A bug fix was backported from CVS [bug report at:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/tao-bugs/message/3915] so that the
> NotifyLoggingService doesn't crash on log close. That's the reason
> why upstream version is 5.4.2.1.
>
> * I've reported and proposed a patch for an issue in MPC. See
> http://deuce.doc.wustl.edu/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1915. I haven't
> received feedback on this yet.
Let's include it.
> * I have tried to tackle as many opened bugs as possible. Currently
> I have no idea about Bug#265238 status.
me too, it's too vague, let's see how the user deals with new
versions.
> 2. Reactor separation using MPC
> ================================
>
> I need to think more about this and read again that thread in
> archives.
Ok.
>
> 3. cidlc package
> ================
>
> There are external dependencies for cidlc to be built. They are
> Debian packages available from
> ftp://kolpackov.net/pub/Utility/Utility-1.2/deb. I think this
> dependency should be handled first.
I can't say for sure that I can do a new package upload this close to
the sarge release. It might be best to leave the cidlc package for
post-sarge.
Regards
Konstantinos